DocumentsDate added
Research article:-
*1Nagar R.C & 2Garg Ganga S
Affiliations:-
1Sr.Professor, Department of Surgery,2Assistant Professor,Department of Anesthesia, Jhalawar Hospital and Medical College Society,Jhalawar(Raj.)India
Abstract:-
Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is commonly caused by road accidents, fall from height and assaults. It is third commonest form of trauma after head injury and chest injury. Incidences are increasing day by day because of rapid increase in number of high speed vehicles on road. It is leading cause of death & disability in the first four decades of life.
Aim: To evaluate role of operative surgery following blunt injury abdomen with reference to different age groups, sex and mode of injury.
Methods and observations: 25 patients of blunt abdominal trauma were included, who were admitted in surgical wards of Jhalawar Medical College and Hospital, Jhalawar. Patients were evaluated on the basis of age, sex and mode of injury. Motor vehicles is the major cause (52%) of injuries to these patients. Spleen was injured in (36%), perforation of small intestines in (36%). Male and female ratio was 3:1.17 and 52% cases were from 21-30 years of age. A detailed clinical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, X-rays & CT Scan were done to evaluate the patients. In 20 Cases, laparotomy was done and 5 cases were treated conservatively.
Conclusion: 20 cases of blunt abdominal trauma were operated who had injuries as: spleen-7, Liver-1,Spleen and liver-1, perforation of small intestines-9, pancreatic contusion-1, duodenal transaction-1. While 5 cases were treated conservatively. Operate the patients who are unstable and have peritonitis & where monitoring facilities are not available. 5 Cases were treated conservatively as per USG/ CT scan evidences. USG abdomen and CT Scan are the best guiding evidences.
Key Words: Blunt trauma abdomen, spleen, liver, pancreas, intestines, duodenum, USG and Anesthesia.
References:
1.Allen RB and Curry CJ : Abdominal trauma; A study of 297 conservative cases. Ann. Surg 1957; 93: 398-404.
2.Tsop, Rodrigue Z, et al : Sonography in blunt abdominal trauma, J. Trauma. 1992; 33 : 39.
3.Lucciarma P, ofner D et al : USG in the initial evaluation and follow up of blunt trauma injury, Surg 1993;114 : 506-12.
4.Jansen JO, yule SR, Loudon MA. “Investigation of blunt abdominal trauma”. BMJ 2008 April; 336 (7650) : 938-42.
5.Yeo A (2004) “Abdominal trauma” In chih HN, Ooi LL. Acute Surgical Management. World scientific publishing company pp 327-33. ISBN – 98 – 238 – 681 – 5.
6.Demetriades D, Velmahos G, Cornell E 3rd, et al, selective non operative management of gunshot wounds of the anterior abdomen. Arch. Surg 1997; 132:187-3.
7.Amal mattu, Deepi Goyal; Barrett, Jeffrey W, Joshua Broder. De Angelis, Michael, Peter Deblieux, Gus M, Garmel, Richard Harrigan, David Karras, Anita L’Italien, David Manthey (2007) Emergency Medicine, avoiding Pit falls and improving the out comes. Malden, Mass : Blackwell Pub. BMJ Books P.61. ISBN – 1 – 4051 – 4166 – 2.
8.Fitzergald JF, crawford ES, DeBakey MD, surgical consideration of non penetrating abdominal injuries. Am.J.Surg. 1960:100, 22-9.
9.Gazzaniga AB. Slanton WW, Bartlett RH. Laparoscopy in the diagnosis of blunt and penetrating injuries to abdomen Am. J. Surg 1996; 131 : 315 – 8.
10.Williams RD, Zollinger RM, Diagnostic & prognostic factors in abdominal trauma. Am J Surg 1959, 97:575.
Article citation:-
Nagar R.C & Garg Ganga S. Prospective study on blunt abdominal trauma. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences (J Pharm Biomed Sci.) 2013 June; 31(31): 1233-1236.
Copyright © 2013 Nagar R.C & Garg Ganga S. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Original article:-
Modi Syamal1*,2 & Chachan Smriti3,4
Affiliation:-
1Tutor, Department of microbiology, Patna Medical College, Patna, Bihar, India.
2Consultant microbiologist, Modi Diagnostics, Road number 11/F, Rajendra nagar, Patna-800016, Bihar, India.
3DNB Trainee (Family medicine), Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, India.
4Visiting consultant, Modi nursing home, Road number 11/F, Rajendra nagar, Patna-800016, Bihar, India.
Abstract:
Context: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is an important cause of morbidity especially in women, both in outpatient as well as in hospitalized settings. Prompt detection and treatment strategies are required for UTI, and in spite of the availability of a wide spectrum of antibiotics, UTI remains a major challenge for the clinician to treat especially with the emergence of new bacterial strains producing extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBLs). Information on ESBL producing organisms causing UTI in India is limited. Current knowledge on antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of uropathogens is mandatory for appropriate therapy.
Aim: The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of UTI at a medical centre in Patna, perform phenotypic characterization of the urinary isolates and study their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns so as to identify the ESBL producers in the population of different uropathogens.
Materials and Methods: Two hundred urinary isolates from patients of clinically suspected UTI, presenting to a multi-speciality nursing home in Patna, were analyzed in this study. Urine cultures were performed on 5% sheep blood agar and Mac Conkey agar. The isolates were identified by conventional methods. Antimicrobial sensitivity test was performed on Mueller Hinton agar by the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. The isolates resistant to cephotaxime were subjected to double disk synergy test method to detect ESBL production and the NCCLS-ESBL phenotypic confirmatory test to confirm ESBL production. Results: Females were found to suffer from UTI 1.85 times more frequently than males. Majority of patients (58.5%) were between 20-50 years of age. The gram negative bacilli were isolated more frequently (85.0%) than the gram positive cocci (15.0%). Majority of the isolates were Escherichia coli (60.0%) followed by Klebsiella spp. (17.5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (12.0%). The E. coli and Klebsiella isolates showed low sensitivity to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole and cephalosporins. All gram negative isolates were sensitive to imipenem. All gram positive isolates were sensitive to amoxycillin+clavulanate and vancomycin. Staphylococcus aureus strains showed low sensitivity towards ampicillin (21.78%) and cotrimoxazole (34.83%) but relatively higher sensitivities to the other antibiotics. 24.70% of gram negative bacilli were found to be ESBL producers, mainly 18 isolates of E.coli (15.0%) and 14 of Klebsiella spp. (40.0%). None of the gram positive isolates was found to produce ESBL. Among the 42 ESBL producers, 97.61% strains were resistant to ampicillin, 95.23% to cotrimoxazole, 85.5% to amikacin, 73.83% to ciprofloxacin and 69.04% to levofloxacin. The ESBL producing isolates of E.coli showed co-resistance of 94.4% against ampicillin and 88.88% to cotrimoxazole and those of Klebsiella spp. showed 100.0% co-resistance against ampicillin and cotrimoxazole. However, all the isolates of Enterobacteriaceae producing ESBL were sensitive to imipenem. Conclusions: Antibiotic resistance especially due to increasing prevalence of ESBL producers is becoming a big problem in the management of UTI patients. High rates of ESBL production may be due to indiscriminate use of extended spectrum antibiotics. Organisms confirmed to be ESBL producers should be reported resistant to all extended spectrum beta lactam antibiotics regardless of susceptibility results. It is important for clinical microbiology laboratory to be aware of these isolates and implement a method for detection of ESBL producing isolates. Active surveillance cultures, contact precautions for patients and judicious use of antimicrobials are required to significantly reduce the incidence of ESBL producers.
Key Words: Antimicrobial sensitivity, extended spectrum β lactamase, phenotypic, urine culture, urinary tract infection.
References:
1.Akram M, Shahid M, Khan AU. Etiology and antibiotic resistance patterns of community-acquired urinary tract infections in J N M C Hospital Aligarh, India. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2007; 6: 4-10.
2.Rajan S, Prabavathy J. Antibiotic Sensitivity and Phenotypic Detection Of ESBL producing E.Coli Strains Causing Urinary Tract Infection In a Community Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. WebmedCentral Pharmaceutical Sciences 2012; 3(11): WMC003840.
3.Sobel JD, Kaye D. Urinary tract infections. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principals and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
4.Tankhiwale SS, Jalgaonkar SV, Ahamad S, Hassani U. Evaluation of extended spectrum beta lactamase in urinary isolates. Indian J Med Res 2004; 120: 553-556.
5.Philippon A, Labia R, Jacoby G. Extended spectrum beta lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33: 1131-6.
6.Katsanis GP, Spargo J, Ferraco MJ, Sutton L, Jacoby GA. Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli strains producing extended spectrum beta lactamases. J Clin Microbial 1994; 32: 691-6.
7.Meyer KS, Urban C, Eagan JA, Berger BJ, Rahal JJ. Nosocomial outbreak of Klebsiella infection to late generation cephalosporins. Annu Intern Med 1993; 119: 353-8.
8.Phillipon A, Fournier G, Paul G, Vedel G, Nevot P. Detection of distribution des beta lactamases a spectre elargi chezles enterobacteries. Med Mal Infect 1988; 12: 869-879.
9.Beckford-Ball J. Related Articles, Management of suspected bacterial urinary tract infection. Nurs Times 2006; 102(36): 25-6.
10.Girou E, Rioux C, Brun-Buisson C, Lobel B. Infection Committee of the French Association of Urology. The postoperative bacteriuria score: a new way to predict nosocomial infection after prostate surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006; 27(8): 847-854.
11.Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS, editors. Bailey and Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002.
12.Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Tuck M. Antibiotics susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45: 493-6.
13.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Methods for Disk Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. NCCLS Document M2-A7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 7th ed. Wayne, PA. 2000.
14.Miles RS, Amyes SGB. Laboratory control of antimicrobial therapy. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, editors. Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.p.151-178.
15.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. International Supplement. NCCLS Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 11th ed. Wayne, PA. 2001.
16.Kumar MS, Lakshmi V, Rajagopalan R. Related Articles, Occurrence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae spp. isolated at a tertiary care institute.Indian J Med Microbiol 2006; 24(3): 208-11.
17.Khan AU, Musharraf A. Plasmid mediated multiple antibiotic resistance in P. mirabilis isolated from the UTI patients. Medical Sci Mon 2004; 10: 598-602.
18.Grungberg RN, Leigh DA, Brumfitt W. The bacteriology of urinary tract infection: does it matter? Proc R Soc Med 1972 June; 65(6): 514–6.
19.Gales AC, Jones RN, Gordon KA, Sader HS et al. Activity and spectrum of 22 antimicrobial agents tested against urinary tract infection pathogens in hospitalized patients in South America, Sentry Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (1998). Journ Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 45: 295-303.
20.Ronald A. The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging pathogens. Am J Med 2002; 113 (Suppl 1A): 145-95.
21.Gupta K, Scholes D, Stamm WE. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. JAMA1999; 281:736-8.
22.Jones RN, Rhomberg PR,Varnan DJ, Mathai D. A comparison of the antimicrobial activity of meropenem and selected broad spectrum antimicrobials tested against multidrug resistant gram negative bacilli including bacteraemic Salmonella spp. Initial studies for the MYSTIC programme in India. J Antimicrob Agents 2002; 20: 426-31.
23.Khurana S, Taneja N, Sharma M. Extended spectrum beta lacatamases mediated resistance in urinary tract isolates of family enterobacteriaceae. Indian J Med Res 2002; 116: 145-9.
24.Gupta V, Yadav A, Joshi RM. Antibiotic resistance pattern in uropathogen. Indian J Med Microbiol 2002; 20: 96-8.
25.Akata F, Tatman-Otcum M, Ozkan E, Tansel O, Otkum M, Tugrul M. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta lactamases producedby nosocomial isolates of enterobacteriacae in Trakata University Hospital, Turkey. New Microbial 2003; 26: 257-62.
26.Paterson DL. Recommendations for treatment of severe infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae producing Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamases (ESBLs) .Clin Microbiol Infect 2000; 6: 460-3.
27.Sanders CC, Thomson KS, Bradford PA. Problems with Detection of Beta Lactam Resistance among Nonfastidious Gram Negative Bacilli. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1993; 7: 411-24.
28.Schwaber MJ, Navon-VeneziaS, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y. High levels of antimicrobial co-resistance among extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents and Chemother 2005; 5: 2137-9.
29.Morosini M, Castillo MG, Coque TM et al. Antimicrobial co-resistance in Extended spectrum Beta Lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae and in vitro activity of Tigecycline. Antimicrob Agents and Chemother 2006; 8: 2695-9.
30.Grover SS, Sharma M, Chattopadhya D, Kapoor H, Pasha ST, Singh G. Phenotypic and genotypic detection of ESBL mediated cephalosporin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae: emergence of high resistance against cefepime, the fourth generation cephalosporin. J Infect Dis 2006; 53(4): 279-88.
31.Mathai D, Rhomberg PR, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN, India Antimicrobial Resistance Study Group. Evaluation of the in vitro activity of six broad-spectrum beta-lactam antimicrobial agents tested against recent clinical isolates from India: a survey of ten medical center laboratories. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 44(4): 367-77.
32.Mohanty S, Singhal R, Sood S, Dhawan B, Das BK, Kapil A. Comparative in vitro activity of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against gram negative bacteria. Indian J Med Res 2005; 122(5): 425-42.
Article citation:-
Modi Syamal & Chachan Smriti. Phenotypic characterization and detection of extended spectrum β-lactamase production in urinary isolates from UTI patients at a medical centre in Patna, India. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences (J Pharm Biomed Sci.) 2013 June; 31(31): 1184-1191.
Copyright © 2013 Modi Syamal & Chachan Smriti. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Research article:-
Kandula Satish1*,Lakshmana Kumar N2,Kartika Balaji S3,Siva Rama Krishna C4 & Hasika R5
Affiliation:-
1Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology,2Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry,3Senior resident, Department of Anaesthesiology,4Postgraduate, Department of Pharmacology,5Postgraduate, Department of Ophthalmology,GSL Medical College, Lakshmipuram, Rajahmundry 533296, AP, India.
Abstract:
Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the micro vascular complication of diabetes and a leading cause of blindness. The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence of DR and its association with gender, age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index (BMI) in known cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus in urban and rural population of Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Methods: 293 known cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus were included in the present study for ophthalmological examination, BMI calculation after recording gender, age and duration of diabetes. Cases were divided in to normal cases and DR cases. Prevalence calculation and group wise analysis was done.
Results: Prevalence of DR is 19.1% at 95% confidence level (CL); confidence interval (CI): 4.5. There is significant variation of age (P value=0.000), duration of diabetes (P value=0.000) between normal cases and DR cases. There is no difference of BMI between groups. Female cases with DR have significantly higher BMI (P value=0.019). Cases with age over 60 and duration of diabetes of more than 10 years have higher risk of developing DR.
Conclusion: Regular screening and awareness programs are required to detect and prevent DR. Further analysis of other parameter is required to study DR in this area.
Key Words: Age; Body mass index; Diabetic Retinopathy; Duration of diabetes.
References:
1.Ronald C.W. Ma, Petr C.Y. Tong. Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes. In: Richard I.G. Holt, Clive S. Cockram, Allan Flyvbjerg, Barry J. Goldstein, editors. Text book of Diabetes. 4th ed. 20 West Sussex (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; pp.45-46.
2.Shashank R Joshi, AK Das, VJ Vijay, V Mohan. Challenges in Diabetes Care in India: Sheer Numbers, Lack of Awareness and Inadequate Control. J Assoc Physicians India 2008;56:443-50.
3.Bhavsar AR, Emerson GG, Emerson MV, Browning DJ. In: Browning DJ. Epidemiology of Diabetic Retinopathy. Springer, New York:2010.
4.Crawford TN, Alfaro DV 3rd, Kerrison JB, Jablon EP. Diabetic retinopathy and angiogenesis. Curr Diabetes Rev. Feb2009;5(1):8-13.
5.Rema M, Premkumar S, Anitha B, Deepa R, Pradeepa R, Mohan V. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Urban India: The Chennai Urban Rural Epidemilogy Study (CURES) Eye Study-1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:2328-33.
6.Rani P K, Raman R, Chandrakantan A, Pal S S, Perumal G M, Sharma. Risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in self-reported rural population with diabetes. J Postgrad Med 2009;55:92-6.
7.Jost B. Jonas, Vinay Nangia, Anshu Khare, Arshia matin, Krishna Bhojwani, Maithi kulakarni. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Diabetic Retinopathy in Rural Central India. Diabetes Care 2013, 36:e69.
8.Simmons D, Clover G, Hope C. Ethnic differences in diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 2007;24(10):1093-8.
9.Varma R, Macias GL, Torres M, Klein R, Pepa FY, Azen SP; et al. Biologic risk factors associated with diabetic retinopathy: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1332-40.
10.Nathan DM, Singer DE, Godine JE, Harrington CH, Perimuter LC. Retinopathy in older type 2 diabetics. Association with glucose control. Diabetes 1986;35(7):797-801.
11.Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102(4):527-32.
12.Hari KVS Kumar, SK Kota, A Basile, KD Modi. PROFILE OF Microvascular Disease in a Tertiary health Care Hospital in India. Ann med health Sci Res 2012;2(2):103-8.
13.Lakshmana Kumar N, Mallikarjuna Rao KVN, Kishore K, Priyadarsini DVS, Kiran Deedi M, Laxman Rao N. Awareness of Diabetes and its relation to prevalence of microalbuminuria in known cases of Type 2 Diabetes. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development. In press 2013.
Kandula Satish et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in known cases of type 2 diabetes in urban and rural population. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences (J Pharm Biomed Sci.) 2013, June; 31(31): 1256-1259.
Copyright © 2013 Kandula Satish et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Letter to Editor
Yadavalli Guruprasad1* & Dinesh Singh Chauhan1
Affiliations:-
*1Assistant Professor,1Reader, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery AME’S Dental College Hospital & Research Centre,Raichur-584103, Karnataka, India.
References:-
1.Van Hoof RF. Four kissing molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.1973; 35: 284.
2.Manani A. Kissing molars: unexpected finding. Dent Update. 1998;25(5):219.
3.Bakaeen G, Baqain ZH. Interesting case: Kissing molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 43: 534.
4.Krishnan B. Kissing molars. Br Dent J. 2008;204(6):281-2.
5.Boffano P, Gallesio C. Kissing molars. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20: 1269-70.
6.Gulses A, Varol A, Sencimen M, Dumlu A. A study of impacted love: kissing molars. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2012;11(4):185-8.
Article citation:-
Yadavalli Guruprasad & Dinesh Singh Chauhan. Hypoglycemic effect of aqueous and ethyl acetate extracts of Senna spectabilis in alloxan induced diabetic male mice. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences (J Pharm Biomed Sci.) 2013 June; 31(31): 1245-1246.
Copyright © 2013 Yadavalli Guruprasad & Dinesh Singh Chauhan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Case report:-
*1Keswani Kiran,2Babaji Prashant, 3Punga Rohit, 4 Choudhary Swati & 5Kamble Suresh
Affiliation:-
1,4 Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry,2Associate Professor, Department of Pedodontics, 3,Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Surgery, Vyas dental College, Jodhpur, India, 5Professor Department of Prasthodontics, MIDC dental college, Latur, Maharastra, India.
Abstract:
Mandibular molars sometimes can present with variation called radix entomolaris, which is an additional root located distolingually (the radix entomolaris). If present, an awareness and understanding of this unusual root and its root canal morphology can contribute to the successful outcome of the root canal treatment. This case report discusses the morphological characteristics of radix entomolaris and judicious clinical approach towards its successful endodontic treatment.
Key Words: Distolingual root, Endodontic management, Radix entomolaris.
References:-
1.De moore R.J.G., Deroose C.A.J.G., Calberson F.L. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge. Int Endod J 2004; 37:789-99.
2.Calberson FL, De Moor RJ, Deroose CA. The Radix Entomolaris and Paramolaris: clinical approach in endodontics, J Enodod 2007; 33(1):58-63.
3.Abella F, Patel S, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercade M, Roig M. Mandibular first molars with disto-lingual roots: review and clinical management. Int Endod J 2012; 45(11):963-78.
4.Song JS, Choi HJ, Jung IY, Jung HS, Kim SO. The prevalence and morphologic classification of distolingual roots in the mandibular molars in a Korean population. J of Endod 2010; 36: 653-7.
5.Visser JB. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der menschlichen Zahnwurzelformen. Hilversum: Rotting 1948; 49-72.
6.Yew SC, Chan K. A retrospective study of endodontically treated mandibular first molars in a Chinese population. J Endod 1993; 19(9): 471-3.
7.Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 463-75.
Article citation:-
Keswani Kiran et al. Endodontic management of Radix Entomolaris-a case report. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences (J Pharm Biomed Sci.) 2013 June; 31(31): 1247-1249.
Copyright © 2013 Keswani Kiran et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.