Property | Value |
Name | Sex determination of Innominate bone by uncommon parameters and its significance |
Description | Original article:- Anatomy
Sharma gopal1* & Vijayvergiya tarun2
1Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy , 2Associate Professor ,Department of Pharmacology Jhalawar Medical college, Jhalawar (Rajasthan),India.
Abstract :- Two hundred adult hip bones (100 males and 100 females) of known sex were obtained at random from the skeletal collection of Department of Anatomy. Measurements were taken with the help of Verniear Caliper, and divider. In this study six parameters were considered including three old parameters and three new parameters. For every parameter, the mean and standard deviation (S.D) was calculated and the range noted. Demarking points were worked out from calculated ranges, i.e. mean + 3 S.D. (Singh and Potturi). The percentage of the bones identified by each demarking point in both sexes was estimated from this material. The observations were recorded. The values obtained for various parameters were compared. It is concluded that among the various criteria pubic crest length and Pelvic and sacral part of chiloticline was found to be useful criteria while distance from anterior inferior iliac spine to iliopubiceminence and to pubic tubercle was useless criteria. Key Words: Iliac spine, Sex determination.
References:- 1.Arsuga, Carrptoro, JM (American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1994;20, 241-57. 2.Derry D.E. On Sexual and racial character of human ilium. Journal of Anatomy 1923; 21, 43-5. 3.GomejPellico L, Fernandez Camachof. Journal of Anatomy, England1992, 417-22. 4.Hooton, E.A. 1946, Up from the ape. Revised ed. Macmillan Co. New York. 5.Howells, W.W. and Hotelling H. A late Pleistocere human skeleton from liujiang China Suggests reginal population variation in sexual dimorphism in human pelvis. (American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1936; 21, 91-106. 6.Isaac B. (2002) Biometry of posterior border of human hip bone.(Journal of Anatomical Soc.Of India 2002; 51 (1) 43-6. 7.Patriquin, M.L., Steyn M. and Loth S.R. Metric assessment of race from Pelvis in South Africans. Forensic Science International 2002; 127, 104-13. 8.Shalini R. Mudholkar, M.G. Tanksale and Jahagirdar. Sexual dimorphism of human humerus. Journal of Anatomical Soc. Of India 1981; 30:3-13. 9.Singh S. and Singh S.P.Weight of femur a useful measurement for identification of sex.(Journal of Anatomical soc.Of India 1974;87, 141-5. 10.Singh S. and Singh G. . Identification of Sex from fibula (Journal of Indian Academy of forensic sciences 1976; 15, 29-34. 11.Singh S. Singh G & Singh S.P. Identification of sex from radius (Journal of Indian Academy of forensic sciences 1974; 13(1):10-3. 12.Singh S. Singh G. & Singh S.P. Identification of sex from Ulna, Indian Journal of Med. Res 1974; 62: 731-5. 13.Singh S. and Singh S.P. Identification of sex from humerus. Indian Journal of Med. Res 1977; 60 :1061-62. 14.Stewart T.D. Medicolegal aspect of skeleton. American Journal of Phy.Anthro 1948; 6: 315-32. 15.Straus W.L. JR. Studies on Primate Ilia. American Journal of Anatomy 1927; 43: 403-10. 16.Washburn, S.L. Skeletal proportions of adult langurs and macaues (Human Biology 1942;14, 444-72. 17.Washburn S.L. Sex differences in pubic bone. American journal of Phy.Anthro. 1948; 6:199-207.
Copyright © 2013 Sharma gopal & Vijayvergiya tarun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
|
Filename | Sharma gopal & Vijayvergiya tarun(836-842).pdf |
Filesize | 212.37 kB |
Filetype | pdf (Mime Type: application/pdf) |
Creator | admin |
Created On: | 04/06/2013 00:00 |
Viewers | Everybody |
Maintained by | Editor |
Hits | 4957 Hits |
Last updated on | 05/09/2013 06:06 |
Homepage | |
CRC Checksum | |
MD5 Checksum |